SPMC Journal of Health Care Services
CASE IN IMAGES

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor in a pediatric patient: case in images

SPMC J Health Care Serv. 2025;11(2):6 ARK: https://n2t.net/ark:/76951/jhcs35pfh2


Vincent Billy Amacna,1 Sheila May Ramos1


1Department of Pathology and Laboratories, Southern Philippines Medical Center, JP Laurel Ave, Davao City, Philippines


Correspondence Vincent Billy Amacna, amacnavincentbilly@gmail.com
Received 7 February 2025
Accepted 22 December 2025
Cite as Amacna VB, Ramos SM. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor in a pediatric patient: case in images. SPMC J Health Care Serv. 2025;11(2):6. https://n2t.net/ark:/76951/jhcs35pfh2


A 15-year-old female presented to our outpatient clinic with a lower back mass after initial evaluation by a private spine surgeon.

Clinical features

At birth, the patient was noted to have a hyperpigmented patch over the lower back. Approximately three years prior to the current admission, a mass measuring about 1 cm developed at the same site and gradually increased in size. Four months before admission, the mass rapidly enlarged to approximately 7 cm, prompting medical consultation. An initial ultrasound demonstrated a fluid-filled vascular mass, and subsequent biopsy revealed a spindle cell neoplasm. One month prior to admission, the patient consulted a private spine surgeon who obtained magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the thoracolumbar spine, which showed an encapsulated, skin-covered, complex cystic soft tissue mass in the posterior lumbar region. Based on the MRI findings and biopsy results, the patient was initially diagnosed with a spindle cell neoplasm and was advised to undergo immediate surgical intervention. Due to financial constraints, she was referred to the Orthopedic Service of our institution, where a wide resection of the lumbar mass with soft tissue reconstruction was planned. The patient denied lower extremity weakness or paresthesia. There was no family history of similar hyperpigmented lesions or masses, and she had no history of radiation exposure.

On physical examination, a well-demarcated cystic mass measuring approximately 14 × 14 × 8 cm was observed over the lower back (Figure 1). The mass was soft, non-tender, and non-erythematous, with no evidence of discharge or necrosis, though a transverse incision scar from a prior biopsy was present. An overlying hyperpigmented patch with irregular borders extended from the thoracolumbar region to the superior gluteal area and contained sparse superficial hair. No café-au-lait macules were identified. The rest of the physical examination findings were unremarkable. Based on the patient’s clinical history and examination findings, a spindle cell neoplasm was initially suspected.

Diagnostics and therapeutics

A CT scan and MRI prior to admission revealed an encapsulated, skin-covered, complex cystic soft tissue mass measuring 11.14 × 4.2 × 12.03 cm in the posterior lumbar region, extending from L1 to L5, without evidence of spinal extension (Figure 2). The imaging characteristics demonstrated overlapping features with plexiform neurofibromas, contributing to diagnostic uncertainty.

The patient was initially admitted under the Orthopedic Service. On admission, chest and lumbosacral spine imaging confirmed the posterior lumbar mass and additionally revealed intervertebral disc disease at L2–L4, with possible anterolisthesis at L2–L3. She was subsequently referred to Pediatric Oncology and Dermatology for multidisciplinary comanagement. Dermatologic evaluation identified a congenital melanocytic nevus corresponding to the hyperpigmented patch present since birth. The patient was also referred to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery for planning of soft tissue reconstruction.

An ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy with frozen section demonstrated spindle cells with bland nuclear features, indistinct cytoplasm, inconspicuous nucleoli, focal necrosis, and rare mitotic figures. Histopathologic findings were consistent with a spindle cell sarcoma of the lower back (Figure 3). Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining showed positivity for S100, TLE-1, and CD34, supporting the diagnosis of a nerve sheath tumor (Figure 4).

The patient was subsequently readmitted for definitive surgical management and underwent wide tumor resection of the lumbar mass with intraoperative frozen section biopsy. Postoperatively, she developed a surgical site infection complicated by wound dehiscence and febrile episodes. Broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics, including vancomycin, meropenem, and ciprofloxacin, were initiated. Wound cultures yielded Candida albicans and Acinetobacter baumannii, prompting the addition of intravenous fluconazole and colistin while continuing prior antibiotics. The infection was managed with surgical debridement and two cycles of vacuum-assisted closure therapy, followed by placement of a full-thickness skin graft harvested from the bilateral gluteal folds (Figure 9). After resolution of the infection, the patient was discharged and later readmitted for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Gross examination of the resected specimen revealed a well-circumscribed mass measuring 16 × 16 × 7.5 cm (Figure 5). Serial sectioning demonstrated approximately 70% necrosis and 40% hemorrhage. Microscopically, the tumor exhibited a marbled low-power appearance with a fascicular growth pattern of atypical spindle cells; all surgical margins were negative for tumor involvement (Figure 6). Additional IHC staining showed focal SOX10 positivity and a mosaic pattern of H3K27me3 expression, indicating partial loss (Figure 7). These histopathologic and immunohistochemical findings were consistent with a low-grade malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), although the presence of high-grade components in unsampled areas could not be entirely excluded.

The hyperpigmented patch was further evaluated by Pediatric Dermatology to assess for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Histologic analysis revealed keratinocyte hyperpigmentation without atypical cells (Figure 8), a finding that may be seen in NF1; however, in the absence of other clinical manifestations, the lesion was classified as a giant congenital melanocytic nevus. Genetic testing was recommended to definitively exclude NF1. The patient was discharged with a final diagnosis of MPNST arising in association with a giant congenital melanocytic nevus. Comprehensive counseling was provided by the Pediatric Oncology Service regarding chemotherapy goals, potential adverse effects, and the risk of recurrence or metastasis. The Orthopedic and Plastic Surgery teams also provided detailed postoperative wound and graft care instructions.

Two weeks following discharge, the patient initiated adjuvant chemotherapy with a doxorubicin–ifosfamide regimen and successfully completed seven cycles. Additionally, she underwent external beam radiation therapy, receiving a total dose of 30 Gy delivered in 30 fractions. Post-radiotherapy CT imaging showed no evidence of recurrent or metastatic disease in the chest, abdomen, or pelvis. At present, the patient remains in good health with no radiologic signs of disease recurrence. She is functionally stable and is preparing to return to school after one year.

Relevance

MPNSTs are rare malignant mesenchymal neoplasms, accounting for approximately 5–10% of all soft tissue sarcomas1 and 3–10% of pediatric sarcomas.2 They affect approximately 0.001% of the general population, with 40% arising sporadically, 50% associated with NF1, and 10% occurring in patients with a history of radiation exposure.3 4 Anatomically, MPNSTs most commonly arise in the soft tissues of the extremities or trunk; therefore, involvement of the lumbar spine is considered an exceedingly rare presentation.5 6 7 Historically, MPNSTs lack distinct clinicopathologic features or defining molecular alterations but are typically associated with loss of function of the NF1 tumor suppressor gene, followed by additional genetic abnormalities such as CDKN2A inactivation and polycomb repressive complex (PRC) protein alterations that contribute to malignant transformation.8 9 10

Establishing a definitive diagnosis remains challenging, as clinical presentation varies depending on anatomic location; lumbar spine tumors may manifest with limb pain, abdominal or back pain, urinary or bowel dysfunction, or may be entirely asymptomatic.10 11 Additionally, MRI findings of MPNSTs and benign neurofibromas often overlap, rendering radiologic differentiation difficult.13 14 Consequently, histopathologic evaluation with an extensive immunohistochemical panel is essential to exclude other malignancies.15 16 Although no single immunohistochemical marker is pathognomonic, 50–60% of MPNSTs demonstrate scattered S100 positivity and weak to moderate CD34 expression.15 Complete or mosaic loss of H3K27me3 expression has emerged as a valuable diagnostic marker in confirming MPNST.17

The primary treatment modality is surgical excision with negative margins to minimize recurrence risk and improve survival outcomes.18 In tumors arising at rare anatomic sites, treatment typically consists of surgery with adjuvant therapy. For tumors larger than 5 cm, adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin and ifosfamide is generally recommended.1 19 Despite aggressive multimodal management, five-year local recurrence rates range from 27.3% to 85.7%,18 and overall survival averages 34–52%, corresponding to a median survival of 5–8 years.20 Overall, prognosis for patients with MPNST remains poor due to the tumor’s rarity, aggressive behavior, and high propensity for recurrence and metastasis.1

In our patient, the clinical presentation, radiographic findings, and initial histopathologic evaluation were highly suggestive of spindle cell carcinoma; however, an extensive IHC panel ultimately excluded this diagnosis. The case was particularly challenging due to multiple radiologic, histologic, and immunohistochemical features that mimicked other tumor entities. Furthermore, the absence of NF1 association, lack of prior radiation exposure, and the tumor’s rare anatomic location added to the diagnostic complexity. A definitive diagnosis was established only after comprehensive IHC analysis of the resected specimen. Given the aggressive behavior of MPNSTs, early and accurate diagnosis is critical, as delays may result in more complex surgical management, reduced responsiveness to chemotherapy, and poorer survival outcomes. In this case, imaging and routine histologic evaluation were insufficient, and confirmation required the integration of multiple immunohistochemical markers to reach the correct diagnosis.


Figure 1    Large, palpable cystic mass in the lumbar region with a transverse scar and an overlying hyperpigmented skin lesion.


Figure 2    Contrast CT scan (A: axial view) and MRI (B: sagittal view) prior to admission showing an encapsulated, skin-covered, complex cystic mass from L1 to L5 in the posterior lumbar region.


Figure 3    Histopathology of the lumbar mass demonstrating areas of necrosis at low-power field (LPF) (A: hematoxylin-eosin stain, x100) and high-power field (HPF) (B: hematoxylin-eosin stain, x400). Sheets of spindle cells with bland nuclear features are observed at LPF (C: hematoxylin-eosin stain, x100) and HPF (D: hematoxylin-eosin stain, x400).


Figure 4    Immunohistochemical staining at high-power magnification (hematoxylin-eosin stain, x400) showing focal positivity for CD34 (A: membranous), S100 (B: cytoplasmic and nuclear), and TLE1 (F: nuclear).


Figure 5    The excised tumor from the lumbar region, measuring approximately 16 × 16 × 7.5 cm.


Figure 6    Histopathology of the resected tumor showing marbled hypo- and hypercellular areas with perivascular accentuation (A, B: hematoxylin-eosin stain, x100 ), fascicularly arranged atypical spindle cells invading the stroma (C: hematoxylin-eosin stain, x100) and high-power view of spindle cells with stromal invasion (D: hematoxylin-eosin stain, x400).


Figure 7    Immunohistochemical staining at high-power magnification (hematoxylin-eosin stain, x400) demonstrating SOX10 with focal nuclear positivity (A), EMA negative (B), and H3K27me3 with diffuse nuclear staining and focal loss (mosaic expression) (C).


Figure 8    Histopathology of the hyperpigmented skin lesion showing basal keratinocyte hyperpigmentation.


Figure 9    Postoperative appearance of the patient’s lower back after placement of a full-thickness graft.



Contributors

VBA and SMR contributed to the diagnostic and therapeutic care of the patient in this report. All of them acquired relevant patient data, and searched for and reviewed relevant medical literature used in this report. VBA wrote the original draft, performed the subsequent revisions. All approved the final version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of this report.


Patient consent

Obtained


Article source

Submitted


Peer review

External


Competing interests

None declared


Access and license

This is an Open Access article licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which allows others to share and adapt the work, provided that derivative works bear appropriate citation to this original work and are not used for commercial purposes. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/


References

1 Cai Z, Tang X, Liang H, Yang R, Yan T, Guo W. Prognosis and risk factors for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep 30;18(1):257.


2 Patrizi S, Miele E, Falcone L, Vallese S, Rossi S, Barresi S, et al. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) and MPNST-like entities are defined by a specific DNA methylation profile in pediatric and juvenile population. Clin Epigenetics. 2024 Jan 4;16(1):9.


3 Yao C, Zhou H, Dong Y, Alhaskawi A, Hasan Abdullah Ezzi S, Wang Z, et al. Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors: Latest Concepts in Disease Pathogenesis and Clinical Management. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 8;15(4):1077.


4 Panigrahi S, Mishra SS, Das S, Dhir MK. Primary malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor at unusual location. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2013 Aug;4(Suppl 1):S83-6.


5 Agaram NP, Wexler LH, Chi P, Antonescu CR. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor in children: A clinicopathologic and molecular study with parallels to the adult counterpart. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2023 Mar;62(3):131-138.


6 Peterson MS, Waddell JK, Ebbert TL, Perry A. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor within the spinal canal with apparent drop metastases. Human Pathology Case Reports. 2018 Nov;14(62):88-91.


7 Ogawa BK, Skaggs DL, Kay RM. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor of the lumbar spine. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009 May;38(5):E89-92.


8 Knight SWE, Knight TE, Santiago T, Murphy AJ, Abdelhafeez AH. Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors-A Comprehensive Review of Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Multidisciplinary Management. Children (Basel). 2022 Jan 1;9(1):38.


9 Hirbe AC, Dehner CA, Dombi E, Eulo V, Gross AM, Sundby T, et al. Contemporary Approach to Neurofibromatosis Type 1-Associated Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2024 Jun;44(3):e432242.


10 Yu YH, Wu JT, Ye J, Chen MX. Radiological findings of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: reports of six cases and review of literature. World J Surg Oncol. 2016 May 10;14:142.


11 Belakhoua SM, Rodriguez FJ. Diagnostic Pathology of Tumors of Peripheral Nerve. Neurosurgery. 2021 Feb 16;88(3):443-456.


12 Rodriguez FJ, Folpe AL, Giannini C, Perry A. Pathology of peripheral nerve sheath tumors: diagnostic overview and update on selected diagnostic problems. Acta Neuropathol. 2012 Mar;123(3):295-319.


13 Paparella MT, Eusebi L, Mazzucchelli R, Guglielmi G. Lumbar malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: a rare case in a young patient. Acta Biomed. 2022 Apr 14;93(S1):e2022095.


14 Guedes-Corrêa JF, Cardoso RSV. Immunohistochemical Markers for Schwannomas, Neurofibromas and Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors—What Can the Recent Literature Tell Us? Arq Bras Neurocir. 2018;37:105-112.


15 Lucas CG, Vasudevan HN, Chen WC, Magill ST, Braunstein SE, Jacques L, et al. Histopathologic findings in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor predict response to radiotherapy and overall survival. Neurooncol Adv. 2020 Oct 1;2(1):vdaa131.


16 Marder CP, Chew FS. Lumbar spinal malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor arising from a benign neurofibroma. Radiol Case Rep. 2015 Nov 6;5(3):417.


17 Czarnecka A, Sobczuk P, Zdzienicki M, Spałek M, Rutkowski P. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour (MPNST). Oncology in Clinical Practice. 2018;14(6):364–376.


18 Seres R, Hameed H, McCabe MG, Russell D, Lee ATJ. The Multimodality Management of Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumours. Cancers (Basel). 2024 Sep 26;16(19):3266.


19 Somatilaka BN, Sadek A, McKay RM, Le LQ. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: models, biology, and translation. Oncogene. 2022 Apr;41(17):2405-2421.


20 Hwang IK, Hahn SM, Kim HS, Kim SK, Kim HS, Shin KH, et al. Outcomes of Treatment for Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors: Different Clinical Features Associated with Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jul;49(3):717-726.



Copyright © 2025 VB Amacna, et al.
Published
December 26, 2025

Issue
Volume 11 Issue 2 (2025)

Section
Case in images




SPMC Journal of Health Care Services


           

Copyright © 2026 Southern Philippines Medical Center.
ISSN (Online): 2467-5962. ISSN (Print): 2012-3183.
All rights reserved.